<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Mitt Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themittblog.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themittblog.com</link>
	<description>Blogging for Mitt Romney and the Conservative Movement</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 12:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on OFFICIAL:  Frosty the Snowman Endorses Romney for 2012 by LeEric</title>
		<link>http://themittblog.com/2008/12/24/official-frosty-the-snowman-endorses-romney-for-2012/#comment-323</link>
		<dc:creator>LeEric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 00:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themittblog.com/?p=391#comment-323</guid>
		<description>Just for the recorded, there is a larger snowman


http://www.adn.com/photos/outdoors/winter/v-gallery/story/110686.html?/1521/gallery/110687-a632640-t3.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just for the recorded, there is a larger snowman</p>
<p><a href="http://www.adn.com/photos/outdoors/winter/v-gallery/story/110686.html?/1521/gallery/110687-a632640-t3.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.adn.com/photos/outdoors/winter/v-gallery/story/110686.html?/1521/gallery/110687-a632640-t3.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on OFFICIAL:  Frosty the Snowman Endorses Romney for 2012 by Paulee</title>
		<link>http://themittblog.com/2008/12/24/official-frosty-the-snowman-endorses-romney-for-2012/#comment-321</link>
		<dc:creator>Paulee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2008 20:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themittblog.com/?p=391#comment-321</guid>
		<description>How clever and such fun, Nate..... Are these your lovely children? This must have been great fun.... He is huge, and has his head on straight...Merry Christmas to you and yours, Paulee from Maine........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How clever and such fun, Nate&#8230;.. Are these your lovely children? This must have been great fun&#8230;. He is huge, and has his head on straight&#8230;Merry Christmas to you and yours, Paulee from Maine&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on OFFICIAL:  Frosty the Snowman Endorses Romney for 2012 by GundyGroup</title>
		<link>http://themittblog.com/2008/12/24/official-frosty-the-snowman-endorses-romney-for-2012/#comment-319</link>
		<dc:creator>GundyGroup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2008 08:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themittblog.com/?p=391#comment-319</guid>
		<description>That snowman is HUGE!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That snowman is HUGE!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on OFFICIAL:  Frosty the Snowman Endorses Romney for 2012 by StevenInBrooklyn</title>
		<link>http://themittblog.com/2008/12/24/official-frosty-the-snowman-endorses-romney-for-2012/#comment-318</link>
		<dc:creator>StevenInBrooklyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2008 05:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themittblog.com/?p=391#comment-318</guid>
		<description>This is really cute.  Hope it happens.

And now back to are depressing political reality.

Actually, a warm, meaningful Christmas to all reading this!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is really cute.  Hope it happens.</p>
<p>And now back to are depressing political reality.</p>
<p>Actually, a warm, meaningful Christmas to all reading this!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Announcing &#8216;The Mitt Forums&#8217; by Nate G.</title>
		<link>http://themittblog.com/2008/12/19/announcing-the-mitt-forums/#comment-304</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 23:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themittblog.com/?p=388#comment-304</guid>
		<description>Shan-

A forum is different than a blog in that it is more of a discussion amongst a community.  Any forum member can begin topics in a forum; in a blog they just leave comments on posts of which the bloggers decide the content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shan-</p>
<p>A forum is different than a blog in that it is more of a discussion amongst a community.  Any forum member can begin topics in a forum; in a blog they just leave comments on posts of which the bloggers decide the content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Announcing &#8216;The Mitt Forums&#8217; by ShannonS</title>
		<link>http://themittblog.com/2008/12/19/announcing-the-mitt-forums/#comment-303</link>
		<dc:creator>ShannonS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 22:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themittblog.com/?p=388#comment-303</guid>
		<description>Forgive my ignorance, Nate, but what benefits will a forum have over a blog?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forgive my ignorance, Nate, but what benefits will a forum have over a blog?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Announcing &#8216;The Mitt Forums&#8217; by GundyGroup</title>
		<link>http://themittblog.com/2008/12/19/announcing-the-mitt-forums/#comment-301</link>
		<dc:creator>GundyGroup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 19:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themittblog.com/?p=388#comment-301</guid>
		<description>I just signed up!  The Mitt Forums is gonna be sweet!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just signed up!  The Mitt Forums is gonna be sweet!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Romney Eager to Run Again by X-Man</title>
		<link>http://themittblog.com/2008/08/30/romney-eager-to-run-again/#comment-293</link>
		<dc:creator>X-Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 22:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themittblog.com/?p=348#comment-293</guid>
		<description>Here's hoping he runs again!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s hoping he runs again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;Yes on 8&#8243; Campaign in California by Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://themittblog.com/2008/08/25/yes-on-8-campaign-in-california/#comment-292</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 01:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themittblog.com/?p=287#comment-292</guid>
		<description>http://antigaybigots.blog.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://antigaybigots.blog.com/" rel="nofollow">http://antigaybigots.blog.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;Yes on 8&#8243; Campaign in California by truth out</title>
		<link>http://themittblog.com/2008/08/25/yes-on-8-campaign-in-california/#comment-276</link>
		<dc:creator>truth out</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 16:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themittblog.com/?p=287#comment-276</guid>
		<description>The initiative that defines marriage as being between one man and one woman, cannot be done by a mere constitutional amendment. Rather, it must be done by a revision of the entire Constitution and the Legislature would have to be involved.
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/politics/cal/la-me-marriage11-2008nov11,0,5162523.story</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The initiative that defines marriage as being between one man and one woman, cannot be done by a mere constitutional amendment. Rather, it must be done by a revision of the entire Constitution and the Legislature would have to be involved.<br />
<a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/local/politics/cal/la-me-marriage11-2008nov11,0,5162523.story" rel="nofollow">http://www.latimes.com/news/local/politics/cal/la-me-marriage11-2008nov11,0,5162523.story</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;Yes on 8&#8243; Campaign in California by Matthew</title>
		<link>http://themittblog.com/2008/08/25/yes-on-8-campaign-in-california/#comment-273</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 18:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themittblog.com/?p=287#comment-273</guid>
		<description>If we're really going to turn to the Bible to argue against gay marriage, then we need to be fair and consider all of the other Biblical passages that are being ignored in this debate. The Bible condoned slavery. It approved a man having sex with another woman if he and his wife could not conceive a child. It condoned polygamy and the keeping of concubines (mistresses). It was written at a time when women were considered to be men's property. Do we agree with any of these ideas today? Of course not.

If we're going to talk about tradition, let's be clear about where traditions come from. Historically in Europe and the U.S., marriage has had nothing to do with interpreting the Bible.

Marriage has historically been about property and procreation: men have agreed to promise to provide for a wife in exchange for whatever property she brings to the marriage. It wasn't until the late 18th and early 19th century that marriage really started to become about love, rather than business.

Procreation was about more than creating a loving family. It was important for the economic, social, and political well being of the family and the community. Children helped with work, and were used by their families to build alliances with other families.

The point of the story of Adam and Eve is to explain the miracle of how we humans began. Adam and Eve had the right biology to procreate, and so they did. But do we punish man-woman couples today who do not procreate? Of course not.

If we look to Galatians 3:28, we find that all are equally blessed in the eyes of Jesus Christ. If this is so, why wouldn't He also bless marriages between partners of the same sex?

We live in a democracy, and our founders took great pains to keep church and state separate. The constitution's purpose is to protect all of the American people. Let's keep this in mind when we vote. If there was ever a time when we could use a lot of Christ Love, that time is clearly now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we&#8217;re really going to turn to the Bible to argue against gay marriage, then we need to be fair and consider all of the other Biblical passages that are being ignored in this debate. The Bible condoned slavery. It approved a man having sex with another woman if he and his wife could not conceive a child. It condoned polygamy and the keeping of concubines (mistresses). It was written at a time when women were considered to be men&#8217;s property. Do we agree with any of these ideas today? Of course not.</p>
<p>If we&#8217;re going to talk about tradition, let&#8217;s be clear about where traditions come from. Historically in Europe and the U.S., marriage has had nothing to do with interpreting the Bible.</p>
<p>Marriage has historically been about property and procreation: men have agreed to promise to provide for a wife in exchange for whatever property she brings to the marriage. It wasn&#8217;t until the late 18th and early 19th century that marriage really started to become about love, rather than business.</p>
<p>Procreation was about more than creating a loving family. It was important for the economic, social, and political well being of the family and the community. Children helped with work, and were used by their families to build alliances with other families.</p>
<p>The point of the story of Adam and Eve is to explain the miracle of how we humans began. Adam and Eve had the right biology to procreate, and so they did. But do we punish man-woman couples today who do not procreate? Of course not.</p>
<p>If we look to Galatians 3:28, we find that all are equally blessed in the eyes of Jesus Christ. If this is so, why wouldn&#8217;t He also bless marriages between partners of the same sex?</p>
<p>We live in a democracy, and our founders took great pains to keep church and state separate. The constitution&#8217;s purpose is to protect all of the American people. Let&#8217;s keep this in mind when we vote. If there was ever a time when we could use a lot of Christ Love, that time is clearly now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;Yes on 8&#8243; Campaign in California by cyclestump</title>
		<link>http://themittblog.com/2008/08/25/yes-on-8-campaign-in-california/#comment-272</link>
		<dc:creator>cyclestump</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 16:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themittblog.com/?p=287#comment-272</guid>
		<description>There are two sports, one is called (American) Football, and the other Rugby.  These sports co-exist in the world, in this country and even in the towns we live in.  
 
The Football folks don't say, "Rugby, you should conform to the way OUR sport is played".  And conversely, Rugby doesn't say, "Football, you should conform to the way OUR sport is played".  They each happily play their respective games, with no intention of changing the other.  
 
It depends on where you are, but you may have an advantage and be more popular if you are a fan of Football, than Rugby, and vice-versa.
 
Rugby players can, and do, join Football teams, and vice-versa.
 
One day a Rugby player showed up at the Football field to play in that day's game.  He trotted onto the field in his Rugby outfit and holding his Rugby ball.  "We're going to play with MY ball because I have civil rights as a person.  You can't make me play by your rules." he said to the Football teams.
 
It's simple, by opposing Prop. 8, gays are trying to change the Heterosexual's game. 
 
Vote YES on 8!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are two sports, one is called (American) Football, and the other Rugby.  These sports co-exist in the world, in this country and even in the towns we live in.  </p>
<p>The Football folks don&#8217;t say, &#8220;Rugby, you should conform to the way OUR sport is played&#8221;.  And conversely, Rugby doesn&#8217;t say, &#8220;Football, you should conform to the way OUR sport is played&#8221;.  They each happily play their respective games, with no intention of changing the other.  </p>
<p>It depends on where you are, but you may have an advantage and be more popular if you are a fan of Football, than Rugby, and vice-versa.</p>
<p>Rugby players can, and do, join Football teams, and vice-versa.</p>
<p>One day a Rugby player showed up at the Football field to play in that day&#8217;s game.  He trotted onto the field in his Rugby outfit and holding his Rugby ball.  &#8220;We&#8217;re going to play with MY ball because I have civil rights as a person.  You can&#8217;t make me play by your rules.&#8221; he said to the Football teams.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s simple, by opposing Prop. 8, gays are trying to change the Heterosexual&#8217;s game. </p>
<p>Vote YES on 8!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;Yes on 8&#8243; Campaign in California by Jeb Ahern</title>
		<link>http://themittblog.com/2008/08/25/yes-on-8-campaign-in-california/#comment-271</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeb Ahern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 21:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themittblog.com/?p=287#comment-271</guid>
		<description>This is a message for anyone who would use the Bible and/or their Christian faith to claim that homosexuals deserve anything less than completely equal treatment under the eyes of the law, including the right to marry the person of their choice.

It  took almost 2000 years for extremist Christians to fully acknowledge the evils of slavery (which is clearly condoned in the Bible).  Their mainstream brethren finally helped them understand. 

It took even longer for extremist Christians to accept the right to vote for women and non-whites.  Their mainstream brethren dragged them along.

It took even longer for extremist Christians to acknowledge that segregation was wrong.  Their mainstream brethren showed them the way.

It took even longer for extremist Christians to tolerate the right to inter-racial marriage.  Their mainstream brethren set the example.

In 2008,  many church goers, clergy members, and religious scholars from around the Christian world respect  gays and lesbians as equals, deserving of equal rights in the eyes of the law and, more importantly, completely deserving of God’s love - unconditionally.

Modern science is in complete agreement that sexual orientation has fundamental genetic, biologic, and developmental origins which establish sexual orientation by birth.

God doesn’t make mistakes, and God doesn’t want you to treat others as if they were mistakes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a message for anyone who would use the Bible and/or their Christian faith to claim that homosexuals deserve anything less than completely equal treatment under the eyes of the law, including the right to marry the person of their choice.</p>
<p>It  took almost 2000 years for extremist Christians to fully acknowledge the evils of slavery (which is clearly condoned in the Bible).  Their mainstream brethren finally helped them understand. </p>
<p>It took even longer for extremist Christians to accept the right to vote for women and non-whites.  Their mainstream brethren dragged them along.</p>
<p>It took even longer for extremist Christians to acknowledge that segregation was wrong.  Their mainstream brethren showed them the way.</p>
<p>It took even longer for extremist Christians to tolerate the right to inter-racial marriage.  Their mainstream brethren set the example.</p>
<p>In 2008,  many church goers, clergy members, and religious scholars from around the Christian world respect  gays and lesbians as equals, deserving of equal rights in the eyes of the law and, more importantly, completely deserving of God’s love - unconditionally.</p>
<p>Modern science is in complete agreement that sexual orientation has fundamental genetic, biologic, and developmental origins which establish sexual orientation by birth.</p>
<p>God doesn’t make mistakes, and God doesn’t want you to treat others as if they were mistakes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;Yes on 8&#8243; Campaign in California by Jessie</title>
		<link>http://themittblog.com/2008/08/25/yes-on-8-campaign-in-california/#comment-270</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 10:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themittblog.com/?p=287#comment-270</guid>
		<description>See http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/1129476/getting_prop_8_straight.html?post=true&#38;cat=17 for a review of the LAW -- not mere opinions -- on Prop. 8.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See <a href="http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/1129476/getting_prop_8_straight.html?post=true&amp;cat=17" rel="nofollow">http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/1129476/getting_prop_8_straight.html?post=true&amp;cat=17</a> for a review of the LAW &#8212; not mere opinions &#8212; on Prop. 8.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;Yes on 8&#8243; Campaign in California by Al Zirpoli</title>
		<link>http://themittblog.com/2008/08/25/yes-on-8-campaign-in-california/#comment-269</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Zirpoli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 21:50:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themittblog.com/?p=287#comment-269</guid>
		<description>Mitt!  You should replace that video this with one!  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wW2BGqnEXag</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mitt!  You should replace that video this with one!  <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wW2BGqnEXag" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wW2BGqnEXag</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
